Rearranged a bit. Use the new macro in valuenode.h introduced in the previous commit...

[synfig.git] / synfig-core / trunk / src / synfig / color.cpp

diff --git a/synfig-core/trunk/src/synfig/color.cpp b/synfig-core/trunk/src/synfig/color.cpp
index a7b5133..81be9eb 100644 (file)
--- a/synfig-core/trunk/src/synfig/color.cpp
+++ b/synfig-core/trunk/src/synfig/color.cpp
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ blendfunc_DIVIDE(Color &a,Color &b,float amount)
        // We add COLOR_EPSILON in order to avoid a divide-by-zero condition.
        // This causes DIVIDE to bias toward positive values, but the effect is
        // really negligible. There is a reason why we use COLOR_EPSILON--we
-       // want the change to be imperceptable.
+       // want the change to be imperceptible.
 
        b.set_r(((b.get_r()/(a.get_r()+COLOR_EPSILON))-b.get_r())*(amount)+b.get_r());
        b.set_g(((b.get_g()/(a.get_g()+COLOR_EPSILON))-b.get_g())*(amount)+b.get_g());
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ blendfunc_LUMINANCE(Color &a,Color &b,float amount)
 static Color
 blendfunc_BEHIND(Color &a,Color &b,float amount)
 {
-       if(a.get_a()==0)a.set_a(COLOR_EPSILON);         //!< \hack
+       if(a.get_a()==0)a.set_a(COLOR_EPSILON);         //!< \todo this is a hack
        a.set_a(a.get_a()*amount);
        return blendfunc_COMPOSITE(b,a,1.0);
 }