From: dooglus <dooglus@1f10aa63-cdf2-0310-b900-c93c546f37ac>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 23:16:30 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Added a comment questioning one of the Random::operator() methods.
X-Git-Url: https://git.pterodactylus.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ba4f6a9c499c64ebca84279cc44bf6449fd245c1;p=synfig.git

Added a comment questioning one of the Random::operator() methods.


git-svn-id: http://svn.voria.com/code@637 1f10aa63-cdf2-0310-b900-c93c546f37ac
---

diff --git a/synfig-core/trunk/src/modules/mod_particle/random.cpp b/synfig-core/trunk/src/modules/mod_particle/random.cpp
index c72c763..783a34c 100644
--- a/synfig-core/trunk/src/modules/mod_particle/random.cpp
+++ b/synfig-core/trunk/src/modules/mod_particle/random.cpp
@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ Random::set_seed(int x)
 	t_mask=rand()+rand()*RAND_MAX;
 }
 
+// this picks one of the POOL_SIZE (256) preset values out of the pool
+// and scales it to be in the range (-1, 1).  is that what it was
+// intended to do?  the distribution is pretty terrible, too, with
+// some elements being picked a hundred times more often than others
 float
 Random::operator()(const int salt,const int x,const int y,const int t)const
 {