From 37d477ee261aaffdc0a0c743be397792513ccf79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: dooglus Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 20:54:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a \todo note questioning a part of the code. git-svn-id: http://svn.voria.com/code@1108 1f10aa63-cdf2-0310-b900-c93c546f37ac --- synfig-studio/trunk/src/synfigapp/value_desc.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/synfig-studio/trunk/src/synfigapp/value_desc.h b/synfig-studio/trunk/src/synfigapp/value_desc.h index 7853335..ad06f33 100644 --- a/synfig-studio/trunk/src/synfigapp/value_desc.h +++ b/synfig-studio/trunk/src/synfigapp/value_desc.h @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ public: get_value(synfig::Time time=0)const { if(parent_is_value_node_const() && parent_value_node) + // \todo "(*parent_value_node)(0)"? shouldn't that be "(*parent_value_node)(time)"? return (*parent_value_node)(0); if(is_value_node() && get_value_node()) return (*get_value_node())(time); -- 2.7.4